linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: uniphier: Fix build with gcc-4.4.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNARZvDJnZTVJP8kxvCoGf_HFyGi0A0Y4rBVeLft4Hj19ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:34:53 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vinson Lee <vlee@...edesktop.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: uniphier: Fix build with gcc-4.4.

Hi Stephen,


2016-12-07 8:16 GMT+09:00 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>:
> On 12/03, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> Hi Vinson,
>>
>> 2016-12-03 9:37 GMT+09:00 Vinson Lee <vlee@...edesktop.org>:
>> > gcc-4.4 has issues with anonymous unions in initializers.
>> >
>> >   CC      drivers/clk/uniphier/clk-uniphier-sys.o
>> > drivers/clk/uniphier/clk-uniphier-sys.c:45: error: unknown field ‘factor’ specified in initializer
>> >
>> > Fixes: 1574d5722636 ("clk: uniphier: remove unneeded member name for union")
>> > Signed-off-by: Vinson Lee <vlee@...edesktop.org>
>>
>>
>> This driver has COMPILE_TEST option, but kbuild test robot
>> did not mention about this.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a bad way of fixing, I think.
>> (what if a new member is inserted before the union in the future?)
>>
>> Rather, please revert the bad commit.
>>
>
> Reverting on top of clk-next will cause build failures though.
> Can you resend the patch series without this first patch please?
> I'll apply them then.
>
> I'll go drop all three patches and wreck Andrew's merge of this
> patch to -mm.


I dropped the first one
and v3 (for the last two) is on the ML now.

Thanks a lot for taking care of this!



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada