linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/22] staging: lustre: osc: handle osc eviction correctly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Dec 2016 23:16:44 +0000 (GMT)
From:   James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
To:     Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xiong@...el.com>,
        Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] staging: lustre: osc: handle osc eviction
 correctly


> On Dec 5, 2016, at 3:55 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 07:53:11PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> >> @@ -3183,8 +3182,10 @@ static int discard_cb(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io *io,
> >> 	/* page is top page. */
> >> 	info->oti_next_index = osc_index(ops) + 1;
> >> 	if (cl_page_own(env, io, page) == 0) {
> >> -		KLASSERT(ergo(page->cp_type == CPT_CACHEABLE,
> >> -			      !PageDirty(cl_page_vmpage(page))));
> >> +		if (!ergo(page->cp_type == CPT_CACHEABLE,
> >> +			  !PageDirty(cl_page_vmpage(page))))
> >> +			CL_PAGE_DEBUG(D_ERROR, env, page,
> >> +				      "discard dirty page?\n");
> > 
> > 
> > I don't understand the point of the ergo macro.  There are way too many
> > double negatives (some of them hidden for my small brain).  How is that
> > simpler than just writing it out:
> > 
> > 	if (page->cp_type == CPT_CACHEABLE &&
> > 	    PageDirty(cl_page_vmpage(page))
> > 		 CL_PAGE_DEBUG(D_ERROR, env, page, "discard dirty page?\n");
> 
> I guess it makes it sound chic or something?
> I am not a huge fan of it either, esp. in a case like this, though
> it might be somewhat more convenient in assertions (where this is converted from).

Not a fan either. Resubmitted patch with ergo removed.