[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5443f56-501e-53d4-ae09-a356573c4096@ozlabs.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 10:27:46 +1100
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Chris Bostic <christopher.lee.bostic@...il.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, sre@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, geert+renesas@...der.be,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
joel@....id.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...id.au,
alistair@...ple.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
Chris Bostic <cbostic@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] drivers/fsi: Add fake master driver
Hi Mark & Chris,
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:14:26PM -0600, Chris Bostic wrote:
>> From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>
>>
>> For debugging, add a fake master driver, that only supports reads,
>> returning a fixed set of data.
>
>> +config FSI_MASTER_FAKE
>> + tristate "Fake FSI master"
>> + depends on FSI
>> + ---help---
>> + This option enables a fake FSI master driver for debugging.
>> +endif
>
>> +static const struct of_device_id fsi_master_fake_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "ibm,fsi-master-fake" },
>> + { },
>> +};
>
> NAK.
>
> DT should be treated as an ABI, and should describe the HW explicitly.
> This makes no sense. This is also missing a binding document.
>
> Have your module take a module parameter allowing you to bind it to
> arbitrary devices, or do something like what PCI does where you can
> bind/unbind arbitrary drivers to devices using sysfs.
This driver is purely for testing the FSI engine scan code; we could
probably just drop this patch since I suspect that it's no longer useful
(now that we have an actual master driver).
If we do want to keep it though, I'd say we remove the device tree
dependency; all this is doing at the moment is triggering the ->probe,
and there are better ways to do that.
Cheers,
Jeremy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists