[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161207233104.GK22129@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 17:31:04 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix improper handling of pcie hotplug events.
Hi Ashok,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:32:44AM -0800, Ashok Raj wrote:
> This patch series fixes pciehp for certain special conditions observed during
> testing.
>
> Ashok Raj (3):
> pciehp: Prioritize data-link event over presence detect
> pciehp: Fix led status when enabling already enabled slot.
> pciehp: Fix race condition handling surprise link-down
>
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
These are all marked for stable, which probably makes sense, but
without bug reports that show the specific bad things that happen, I
can't justify that. Per Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt, we
should have examples of "real bugs that bother people."
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists