[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed498aea-127a-246c-79e8-67ade61ba0ce@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 06:50:22 +0100
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX
possible entries
On 05/12/16 18:49, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> This is the third pass at my patchset to fix up our problems with
> XENMEM_machine_memory_map on large systems. The only changes on this
> pass were to flesh out the comment above the E820_X_MAX definition, and
> to add Juergen's Reviewed-by to the second patch.
>
> Let me know if anyone has any questions/comments!
>
> Alex Thorlton (2):
> x86: Make E820_X_MAX unconditionally larger than E820MAX
> xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h | 12 ++++++++----
> arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
Ingo, do you have any preferences through which tree those patches
should go? I'd like to have at least patch 2 in 4.10, so I could take
it through the Xen tree.
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists