[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161208091346.uzz3ix4hfpvx2bfu@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 10:13:47 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Charles (Chas) Williams" <ciwillia@...cade.com>,
"M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@...box.com>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Make logical package management more robust
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:04:25AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The logical package management has several issues:
>
> - The APIC ids provided by ACPI are not required to be the same as the
> initial APIC id which can be retrieved by CPUID. The APIC ids provided
> by ACPI are those which are written by the BIOS into the APIC. The
> initial id is set by hardware and can not be changed. The hardware
> provided ids contain the real hardware package information.
>
> Especially AMD sets the effective APIC id different from the hardware id
> as they need to reserve space for the IOAPIC ids starting at id 0.
>
> As a consequence those machines trigger the currently active firmware
> bug printouts in dmesg, These are obviously wrong.
>
> - Virtual machines have their own interesting way of enumerating APICs and
> packages which are not reliably covered by the current implementation.
>
> The sizing of the mapping array has been tweaked to be generously large to
> handle systems which provide a wrong core count when HT is disabled so the
> whole magic which checks for space in the physical hotplug case is not
> needed anymore.
>
> Simplify the whole machinery and do the mapping when the CPU starts and the
> CPUID derived physical package information is available. This solves the
> observed problems on AMD machines and works for the virtualization issues
> as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Already
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Thanks!
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists