[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1481211043.2361.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 07:30:43 -0800
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, "xfs@....sgi.com" <xfs@....sgi.com>,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
"lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 13:26 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 07-12-16 06:57:06, James Bottomley wrote:
> [...]
> > Just on this point, since there seems to be a lot of confusion: lsf
> > -pc
> > is the list for contacting the programme committee, so you cannot
> > subscribe to it.
> >
> > There is no -discuss equivalent, like kernel summit has, because we
> > expect you to cc the relevant existing mailing list and have the
> > discussion there instead rather than expecting people to subscribe
> > to a
> > new list.
>
> There used to be lsf@...ts.linux-foundation.org. Is it not active
> anymore?
Not until we get the list of invitees sorted out. And then it's only
for stuff actually to do with lsf (like logistics, bof or session
requests or other meetups). Any technical stuff should still be cc'd
to the relevant mailing list.
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists