lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be2861b4-d830-fbd7-e9eb-ebc8e4d913a2@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2016 08:21:28 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [HMM v14 05/16] mm/ZONE_DEVICE/unaddressable: add support for
 un-addressable device memory

On 12/08/2016 08:39 AM, Jérôme Glisse wrote:
> Architecture that wish to support un-addressable device memory should make
> sure to never populate the kernel linar mapping for the physical range.

Does the platform somehow provide a range of physical addresses for this
unaddressable area?  How do we know no memory will be hot-added in a
range we're using for unaddressable device memory, for instance?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ