linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] ixgbe: fcoe: return value of skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAABZP2y9arBT2axpU8yP8r_YzoWD8KdUntRMjbNCJiBE7wFwXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2016 09:21:00 +0800
From:   Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
To:     Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc:     intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ixgbe: fcoe: return value of skb_linearize should be handled

Thanks Jeff for your advice,
Sorry for the  my innocence as a Linux kernel rookie.

Zhouyi

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Jeff Kirsher
<jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 15:43 +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn>
>> Reviewed-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_fcoe.c | 6 +++++-
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 3 +--
>>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Did Cong, Yuval and Eric give their Reviewed-by offline?  I see they made
> comments and suggests, but never saw them actually give you their Reviewed-
> by.  You cannot automatically add their Reviewed-by, Signed-off-by, etc
> just because someone provides feedback on your patch.