linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/35] 4.8.13-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161208162607.GD13456@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2016 17:26:07 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc:     "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        dl9pf@....de, sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/35] 4.8.13-stable review

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:12:35PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> + labs: Jan-Simon, Collabora
> 
> kernelci.org bot <bot@...nelci.org> writes:
> 
> > stable-rc boot: 99 boots: 3 failed, 94 passed with 2 offline (v4.8.12-36-g826f4e030f39)
> >
> > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.12-36-g826f4e030f39/
> > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.12-36-g826f4e030f39/
> >
> > Tree: stable-rc
> > Branch: local/linux-4.8.y
> > Git Describe: v4.8.12-36-g826f4e030f39
> > Git Commit: 826f4e030f39e8995af995afcbe74301e383fe74
> > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> > Tested: 32 unique boards, 10 SoC families, 27 builds out of 207
> >
> > Boot Failures Detected:
> >
> > arm:
> >
> >     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n
> >         imx6q-sabrelite: 1 failed lab
> 
> This one has been failing since v4.8.8.  Added Collabora lab for investigation.
> 
> >         omap5-uevm: 1 failed lab
> >
> >     multi_v7_defconfig
> >         omap5-uevm_rootfs:nfs: 1 failed lab
> 
> Lab (Jan Simon) is looking into these OMAP5 issues.
> 
> Interpretation: Looks OK.  no new blockers.

Great, thanks for the interpretation.

greg k-h