[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <79cd0aa8-f3d8-14c9-07eb-cb5231ebb83f@mev.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:12:53 +0000
From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Chris Cesare <chris.cesare@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: staging: comedi: usbduxsigma: Split a condition check in
usbduxsigma_alloc_usb_buffers()
On 08/12/16 15:46, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> * Reduce memory allocation sizes for two function calls.
>
> Is this implementation detail worth for further considerations?
I assume you are referring to the allocation of devpriv->ai_urbs and
devpriv->ao_urbs? Your patch does not reduce their sizes; `urb` and
`*devpriv->ai_urbs` have the same type `struct urb *`. Having said
that, `sizeof(*devpriv->ai_urbs)` is cleaner code than `sizeof(urb)` in
this case.
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@....co.uk> )=-
-=( Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/ )=-
Powered by blists - more mailing lists