[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58eea45f-b8fe-6892-e784-b41638c62fd8@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:04:11 -0600
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Wingman Kwok <w-kwok2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: add support of cpts
HW_TS_PUSH
On 12/03/2016 05:21 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:04:25PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> This also change overflow polling period when HW_TS_PUSH feature is
>> enabled - overflow check work will be scheduled more often (every
>> 200ms) for proper HW_TS_PUSH events reporting.
>
> For proper reporting, you should make use of the interrupt. The small
> fifo (16 iirc) could very well overflow in 200 ms. The interrupt
> handler should read out the entire fifo at each interrupt.
>
huh. Seems this is not really good idea, because MISC Irq will be
triggered for *any* CPTS event and there is no way to enable it just for
HW_TS_PUSH. So, this doesn't work will with current code for RX/TX timestamping
(which uses polling mode). + runtime overhead in net RX/TX caused by
triggering more interrupts.
May be, overflow check/polling timeout can be made configurable (module parameter).
--
regards,
-grygorii
Powered by blists - more mailing lists