[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <060287c7-d1af-45d5-70ea-ad35d4bbeb84@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 20:53:00 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mhocko@...e.com" <mhocko@...e.com>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@...gnu.org" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"dgilbert@...hat.com" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH kernel v5 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast
(de)inflating & fast live migration
On 12/08/2016 08:45 PM, Li, Liang Z wrote:
> What's the conclusion of your discussion? It seems you want some
> statistic before deciding whether to ripping the bitmap from the
> ABI, am I right?
I think Andrea and David feel pretty strongly that we should remove the
bitmap, unless we have some data to support keeping it. I don't feel as
strongly about it, but I think their critique of it is pretty valid. I
think the consensus is that the bitmap needs to go.
The only real question IMNHO is whether we should do a power-of-2 or a
length. But, if we have 12 bits, then the argument for doing length is
pretty strong. We don't need anywhere near 12 bits if doing power-of-2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists