[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20161205081803epcms5p508a7587d144d706b7ce86ff611a833e4@epcms5p5>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 08:18:03 +0000
From: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com
<catalin.marinas@....com>,
james.morse@....com <james.morse@....com>,
mark.rutland@....com <mark.rutland@....com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com
<sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
labbott@...hat.com <labbott@...hat.com>,
shijie.huang@....com <shijie.huang@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ajeet Kumar Yadav <ajeet.y@...sung.com>,
PANKAJ MISHRA <pankaj.m@...sung.com>,
Vaneet Narang <v.narang@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Correcting format specifier for printin 64 bit addresses
Hi Will,
>There are a bunch of these you haven't caught:
>
....
>arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c: pr_warn("fix_to_virt(FIX_BTMAP_END): %08lx\n",
>
>so it would probably make sense to fix these to be consistent.
>
>Will
All changes are sent in new patch except kvm changes, because for kvm we don't not much idea.
>arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c: pr_info_ratelimited("%s[%d]: bad frame in %s: pc=%08llx sp=%08llx\n",
>arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c: pr_info_ratelimited("%s[%d]: bad frame in %s: pc=%08llx sp=%08llx\n",
and signal32 fiel changes are not required, because it meant only for 32 bit.
--------------------
Thanks and Regards,
Maninder Singh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists