[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3d7a0f3-caa4-91f9-4148-b62cf5e23886@wiesinger.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:06:25 +0100
From: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@...singer.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Still OOM problems with 4.9er kernels
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update.sh: line 40: 1591 Killed ${EXE} update ${PARAMS}
(does dnf clean all;dnf update)
Linux database.intern 4.9.0-0.rc8.git2.1.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Dec 7
17:53:29 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Updated bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314697
Any chance to get it fixed in 4.9.0 release?
Ciao,
Gerhard
On 30.11.2016 08:20, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> See also:
> Bug 1314697 - Kernel 4.4.3-300.fc23.x86_64 is not stable inside a KVM VM
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314697
>
> Ciao,
> Gerhard
>
>
> On 30.11.2016 08:10, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm having out of memory situations with my "low memory" VMs in KVM
>> under Fedora (Kernel 4.7, 4.8 and also before). They started to get
>> more and more sensitive to OOM. I recently found the following info:
>>
>> https://marius.bloggt-in-braunschweig.de/2016/11/17/linuxkernel-4-74-8-und-der-oom-killer/
>>
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg113661.html
>>
>> Therefore I tried the latest Fedora kernels:
>> 4.9.0-0.rc6.git2.1.fc26.x86_64
>>
>> But OOM situation is still very easy to reproduce:
>>
>> 1.) VM with 128-384MB under Fedora 25
>>
>> 2.) Having some processes run without any load (e.g. Apache)
>>
>> 3.) run an update with: dnf clean all; dnf update
>>
>> 4.) dnf python process get's killed
>>
>>
>> Please make the VM system working again in Kernel 4.9 and to use swap
>> again correctly.
>>
>> Thnx.
>>
>> Ciao,
>>
>> Gerhard
>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists