[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-c029a2bec66e42e57538cb65e28618baf6a4b311@git.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 03:14:48 -0800
From: tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: cmetcalf@...lanox.com, richardcochran@...il.com, mingo@...nel.org,
christopher.s.hall@...el.com, lvivier@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
liavr@...lanox.com, peterz@...radead.org, prarit@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, john.stultz@...aro.org, david@...son.dropbear.id.au
Subject: [tip:timers/core] timekeeping: Use mul_u64_u32_shr() instead of
open coding it
Commit-ID: c029a2bec66e42e57538cb65e28618baf6a4b311
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/c029a2bec66e42e57538cb65e28618baf6a4b311
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 20:49:38 +0000
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:06:42 +0100
timekeeping: Use mul_u64_u32_shr() instead of open coding it
The resume code must deal with a clocksource delta which is potentially big
enough to overflow the 64bit mult.
Replace the open coded handling with the proper function.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Parit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>
Cc: "Christopher S. Hall" <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Liav Rehana <liavr@...lanox.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161208204228.921674404@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 26 +++++---------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 82e1b5c..da233cd 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1644,7 +1644,7 @@ void timekeeping_resume(void)
struct clocksource *clock = tk->tkr_mono.clock;
unsigned long flags;
struct timespec64 ts_new, ts_delta;
- cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
+ cycle_t cycle_now;
sleeptime_injected = false;
read_persistent_clock64(&ts_new);
@@ -1670,27 +1670,11 @@ void timekeeping_resume(void)
cycle_now = tk->tkr_mono.read(clock);
if ((clock->flags & CLOCK_SOURCE_SUSPEND_NONSTOP) &&
cycle_now > tk->tkr_mono.cycle_last) {
- u64 num, max = ULLONG_MAX;
- u32 mult = clock->mult;
- u32 shift = clock->shift;
- s64 nsec = 0;
-
- cycle_delta = clocksource_delta(cycle_now, tk->tkr_mono.cycle_last,
- tk->tkr_mono.mask);
-
- /*
- * "cycle_delta * mutl" may cause 64 bits overflow, if the
- * suspended time is too long. In that case we need do the
- * 64 bits math carefully
- */
- do_div(max, mult);
- if (cycle_delta > max) {
- num = div64_u64(cycle_delta, max);
- nsec = (((u64) max * mult) >> shift) * num;
- cycle_delta -= num * max;
- }
- nsec += ((u64) cycle_delta * mult) >> shift;
+ u64 nsec, cyc_delta;
+ cyc_delta = clocksource_delta(cycle_now, tk->tkr_mono.cycle_last,
+ tk->tkr_mono.mask);
+ nsec = mul_u64_u32_shr(cyc_delta, clock->mult, clock->shift);
ts_delta = ns_to_timespec64(nsec);
sleeptime_injected = true;
} else if (timespec64_compare(&ts_new, &timekeeping_suspend_time) > 0) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists