[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8520D5D51A55D047800579B094147198263A79AC@XAP-PVEXMBX02.xlnx.xilinx.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 02:07:19 +0000
From: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"Janusz.Dziedzic@...to.com" <Janusz.Dziedzic@...to.com>,
"rmanohar@....qualcomm.com" <rmanohar@....qualcomm.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"ath9k-devel@....qualcomm.com" <ath9k-devel@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: RE: ATH9 driver issues on ARM64
> On 08/12/16 18:33, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> >> On 08/12/16 15:29, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> >>
> >> Two things:
> >>
> >>> Here is the cat /proc/interrupts (after we do interface up):
> >>>
> >>> root@:~# ifconfig wlan0 up
> >>> [ 1548.926601] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
> >>> root@...inx-ZCU102-2016_3:~# cat /proc/interrupts
> >>> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
> >>> 1: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 29 Edge arch_timer
> >>> 2: 19873 20058 19089 17435 GICv2 30 Edge arch_timer
>
> By the way, please use a recent kernel. Seeing edge here means you're running
> with something that is a bit old (and broken). And since you haven't even said
> what revision of the kernel you're using, hslping you is not an easy task. tglx told
> you something similar about a week ago.
>
> >>> 12: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 156 Level zynqmp-dma
> >>> 13: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 157 Level zynqmp-dma
> >>> 14: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 158 Level zynqmp-dma
> >>> 15: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 159 Level zynqmp-dma
> >>> 16: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 160 Level zynqmp-dma
> >>> 17: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 161 Level zynqmp-dma
> >>> 18: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 162 Level zynqmp-dma
> >>> 19: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 163 Level zynqmp-dma
> >>> 20: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 164 Level Mali_GP_MMU,
> Mali_GP,
> >> Mali_PP0_MMU, Mali_PP0, Mali_PP1_MMU, Mali_PP1
> >>
> >> I'm not even going to consider looking at something that is running
> >> out of tree code. So please start things with a fresh kernel that
> >> doesn't contain stuff we can't debug.
> >>
> > Ok will test with fresh kernel.
> >
> >>> 30: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 95 Level eth0, eth0
> >>> 206: 314 0 0 0 GICv2 49 Level cdns-i2c
> >>> 207: 40 0 0 0 GICv2 50 Level cdns-i2c
> >>> 209: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 150 Level nwl_pcie:misc
This irq line is handling miscellaneous interrupts this shows level triggered.
> >>> 214: 12 0 0 0 GICv2 47 Level ff0f0000.spi
> >>> 215: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 58 Level ffa60000.rtc
> >>> 216: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 59 Level ffa60000.rtc
> >>> 217: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 165 Level ahci-
> ceva[fd0c0000.ahci]
> >>> 218: 61 0 0 0 GICv2 81 Level mmc0
> >>> 219: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 187 Level arm-smmu global fault
> >>> 220: 471 0 0 0 GICv2 53 Level xuartps
> >>> 223: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 154 Level fd4c0000.dma
> >>> 224: 3 0 0 0 dummy 1 Edge ath9k
> >>
> >> What is this "dummy" controller? And if that's supposed to be a
> >> legacy interrupt from the PCI device, it has the wrong trigger.
> >
> > Yes it is for legacy interrupt, wrong trigger means ?
>
> Aren't legacy interrupts supposed to be *level* triggered, and not edge?
>
Yes agreed.
For legacy interrupts im using irq_set_chained_handler_and_data so the irq line between bridge and GIC
Will not be shown here. The above how is virq for legacy, which is given by kernel, not sure why its state is set
to edge.
Thanks & Regards,
Bharat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists