lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpW-KNT4iZPwtHMzzBxvPVvvn6+9OfJMcUjBOXS_zJ_NEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:13:50 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...ia.com>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho.andersen@...onical.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        stephen hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
        netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net: deadlock on genl_mutex

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
> Chain exists of:
>  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
>        CPU0                    CPU1
>        ----                    ----
>   lock(nlk->cb_mutex);
>                                lock(&table[i].mutex);
>                                lock(nlk->cb_mutex);
>   lock(genl_mutex);

Similar to the unix bindlock, this one looks false positive to me too.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ