[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161209161747.977767448@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 17:17:43 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 01/28] virtio-net: add a missing synchronize_net()
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit 963abe5c8a0273a1cf5913556da1b1189de0e57a ]
It seems many drivers do not respect napi_hash_del() contract.
When napi_hash_del() is used before netif_napi_del(), an RCU grace
period is needed before freeing NAPI object.
Fixes: 91815639d880 ("virtio-net: rx busy polling support")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1465,6 +1465,11 @@ static void virtnet_free_queues(struct v
netif_napi_del(&vi->rq[i].napi);
}
+ /* We called napi_hash_del() before netif_napi_del(),
+ * we need to respect an RCU grace period before freeing vi->rq
+ */
+ synchronize_net();
+
kfree(vi->rq);
kfree(vi->sq);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists