[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161209161756.526706335@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 17:21:07 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 38/45] Dont feed anything but regular iovecs to blk_rq_map_user_iov
4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
commit a0ac402cfcdc904f9772e1762b3fda112dcc56a0 upstream.
In theory we could map other things, but there's a reason that function
is called "user_iov". Using anything else (like splice can do) just
confuses it.
Reported-and-tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
block/blk-map.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- a/block/blk-map.c
+++ b/block/blk-map.c
@@ -118,6 +118,9 @@ int blk_rq_map_user_iov(struct request_q
struct iov_iter i;
int ret;
+ if (!iter_is_iovec(iter))
+ goto fail;
+
if (map_data)
copy = true;
else if (iov_iter_alignment(iter) & align)
@@ -140,6 +143,7 @@ int blk_rq_map_user_iov(struct request_q
unmap_rq:
__blk_rq_unmap_user(bio);
+fail:
rq->bio = NULL;
return -EINVAL;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists