[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161209161756.319310512@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 17:21:02 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 33/45] ipv4: Drop leaf from suffix pull/push functions
4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
[ Upstream commit 1a239173cccff726b60ac6a9c79ae4a1e26cfa49 ]
It wasn't necessary to pass a leaf in when doing the suffix updates so just
drop it. Instead just pass the suffix and work with that.
Since we dropped the leaf there is no need to include that in the name so
the names are updated to node_push_suffix and node_pull_suffix.
Finally I noticed that the logic for pulling the suffix length back
actually had some issues. Specifically it would stop prematurely if there
was a longer suffix, but it was not as long as the original suffix. I
updated the code to address that in node_pull_suffix.
Fixes: 5405afd1a306 ("fib_trie: Add tracking value for suffix length")
Suggested-by: Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
Tested-by: Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -892,22 +892,24 @@ static struct key_vector *resize(struct
return tp;
}
-static void leaf_pull_suffix(struct key_vector *tp, struct key_vector *l)
+static void node_pull_suffix(struct key_vector *tn, unsigned char slen)
{
- while ((tp->slen > tp->pos) && (tp->slen > l->slen)) {
- if (update_suffix(tp) > l->slen)
+ unsigned char node_slen = tn->slen;
+
+ while ((node_slen > tn->pos) && (node_slen > slen)) {
+ slen = update_suffix(tn);
+ if (node_slen == slen)
break;
- tp = node_parent(tp);
+
+ tn = node_parent(tn);
+ node_slen = tn->slen;
}
}
-static void leaf_push_suffix(struct key_vector *tn, struct key_vector *l)
+static void node_push_suffix(struct key_vector *tn, unsigned char slen)
{
- /* if this is a new leaf then tn will be NULL and we can sort
- * out parent suffix lengths as a part of trie_rebalance
- */
- while (tn->slen < l->slen) {
- tn->slen = l->slen;
+ while (tn->slen < slen) {
+ tn->slen = slen;
tn = node_parent(tn);
}
}
@@ -1069,7 +1071,7 @@ static int fib_insert_alias(struct trie
/* if we added to the tail node then we need to update slen */
if (l->slen < new->fa_slen) {
l->slen = new->fa_slen;
- leaf_push_suffix(tp, l);
+ node_push_suffix(tp, new->fa_slen);
}
return 0;
@@ -1482,7 +1484,7 @@ static void fib_remove_alias(struct trie
/* update the trie with the latest suffix length */
l->slen = fa->fa_slen;
- leaf_pull_suffix(tp, l);
+ node_pull_suffix(tp, fa->fa_slen);
}
/* Caller must hold RTNL. */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists