linux-kernel - Re: [RFC, PATCHv1 00/28] 5-level paging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161209164011.GL8388@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:40:11 -0800
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCHv1 00/28] 5-level paging

> On other hand, large virtual address space would put more pressure on
> cache -- at least one more page table per process, if we make 56-bit VA
> default.

The top level page always has to be there unless you disable it at boot time
(unless you go for a scheme where some processes share top level pages, and
others do not, which would likely be very complicated)

But even with that it is more than one: A typical set up has at least two extra
4K pages overhead, one for the bottom and one for the top mappings. Could easily be
more.

-Andi