[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <71044708-c5e4-3a14-b162-dfc600311a60@fastmail.fm>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 20:09:58 +0100
From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: Combine two kmalloc() calls into one in sb_equal()
On 09.12.2016 19:30, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:09:13 +0100
>
> The function "kmalloc" was called in one case by the function "sb_equal"
> without checking immediately if it failed.
Err, your patch actually *replaces* the check. So where did you get the
idea from that it is not checked immediately?
[...]
> - tmp1 = kmalloc(sizeof(*tmp1),GFP_KERNEL);
> - tmp2 = kmalloc(sizeof(*tmp2),GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> - if (!tmp1 || !tmp2) {
> - ret = 0;
> - goto abort;
> - }
This is not immediately?
Bernd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists