[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1481313824.3358.38.camel@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 21:03:44 +0100
From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, shuah@...nel.org,
jeyu@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, acme@...hat.com, corbet@....net
Cc: martin.wilck@...e.com, mmarek@...e.com, pmladek@...e.com,
hare@...e.com, rwright@....com, jeffm@...e.com, DSterba@...e.com,
fdmanana@...e.com, neilb@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
rgoldwyn@...e.com, subashab@...eaurora.org, xypron.glpk@....de,
keescook@...omium.org, atomlin@...hat.com, mbenes@...e.cz,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, mingo@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 10/10] kmod: add a sanity check on module loading
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 11:49 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> Although this does get us in the business of keeping alias maps in
> kernel, the the work to support and maintain this is trivial.
You've implemented a special treatment for request_module("fs-$X")in
finished_kmod_load(), but there are many more aliases defined (and
used) in the kernel. Do you plan to implement special code for "char-
major-$X", "crypto-$X", "binfmt-$X" etc. later?
Regards
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists