[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161209162148.44887938@xeon-e3>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 16:21:48 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bjorn.helgaas@...il.com" <bjorn.helgaas@...il.com>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"leann.ogasawara@...onical.com" <leann.ogasawara@...onical.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] hv_netvsc: Implement VF matching based on serial
numbers
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 22:35:05 +0000
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Emulated NIC is already excluded in start of netvc notifier handler.
> > > >
> > > > static int netvsc_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this,
> > > > unsigned long event, void *ptr)
> > > > {
> > > > struct net_device *event_dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
> > > >
> > > > /* Skip our own events */
> > > > if (event_dev->netdev_ops == &device_ops)
> > > > return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > >
> > >
> > > Emulated device is not based on netvsc. It's the native Linux
> > (dec100M?)
> > > Driver. So this line doesn't exclude it. And how about other NIC type
> > > may be added in the future?
> >
> > Sorry, forgot about that haven't used emulated device in years.
> > The emulated device should appear to be on a PCI bus, but the serial
> > would not match??
>
> It's not a vmbus device, not a hv_pci device either. Hv_PCI is a subset
> of vmbus devices. So emulated NIC won't have hv_pci serial number.
>
> In my patch, the following code ensure, we only try to get serial number
> after confirming it's vmbus and hv_pci device:
>
> + if (!dev_is_vmbus(dev))
> + continue;
> +
> + hdev = device_to_hv_device(dev);
> + if (hdev->device_id != HV_PCIE)
> + continue;
Ok, the walk back up the device tree is logically ok, but I don't
know enough about PCI device tree to be assured that it is safe.
Also, you could short circuit away most of the unwanted devices
by making sure the vf_netdev->dev.parent is a PCI device.
Also the loop to look for serial number in the devices on the
hv_pci bus could be made a separate function and have a short circuit
return (although it probably doesn't matter since there will only
be on e PCI VF device per bus there).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists