linux-kernel - [PATCH] KVM: hyperv: split lock to protect struct kvm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161210074607.30018-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date:   Sat, 10 Dec 2016 08:46:07 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dvyukov@...hat.com, rkagan@...tuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: hyperv: split lock to protect struct kvm_hv

Otherwise, there is an AB-BA deadlock between kvm->lock and
vcpu->mutex.

Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
	Compile-tested only.

 Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt |  2 ++
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h       |  1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c                 | 10 +++++-----
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                    |  1 +
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt
index e5dd9f4d6100..5dd06289ce59 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ The acquisition orders for mutexes are as follows:
 For spinlocks, kvm_lock is taken outside kvm->mmu_lock.  Everything
 else is a leaf: no other lock is taken inside the critical sections.
 
+In particular, on x86, vcpu->mutex is taken outside kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock.
+
 2: Exception
 ------------
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 7892530cbacf..2e25038dbd93 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -704,6 +704,7 @@ struct kvm_apic_map {
 
 /* Hyper-V emulation context */
 struct kvm_hv {
+	struct mutex hv_lock;
 	u64 hv_guest_os_id;
 	u64 hv_hypercall;
 	u64 hv_tsc_page;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
index 99cde5220e07..021abafabc12 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
@@ -1142,9 +1142,9 @@ int kvm_hv_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data, bool host)
 	if (kvm_hv_msr_partition_wide(msr)) {
 		int r;
 
-		mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
+		mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
 		r = kvm_hv_set_msr_pw(vcpu, msr, data, host);
-		mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
 		return r;
 	} else
 		return kvm_hv_set_msr(vcpu, msr, data, host);
@@ -1155,9 +1155,9 @@ int kvm_hv_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *pdata)
 	if (kvm_hv_msr_partition_wide(msr)) {
 		int r;
 
-		mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
+		mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
 		r = kvm_hv_get_msr_pw(vcpu, msr, pdata);
-		mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
 		return r;
 	} else
 		return kvm_hv_get_msr(vcpu, msr, pdata);
@@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@ int kvm_hv_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *pdata)
 
 bool kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	return kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_hypercall & HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL_ENABLE;
+	return READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_hypercall) & HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL_ENABLE;
 }
 
 static void kvm_hv_hypercall_set_result(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 result)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index f0aee98e7492..30fc403df802 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -7861,6 +7861,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
 
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.tsc_write_lock);
 	mutex_init(&kvm->arch.apic_map_lock);
+	mutex_init(&kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
 
 	kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset = -ktime_get_boot_ns();
-- 
2.9.3