linux-kernel - [PATCHv2 4/5] perf tools: Allow to ignore missing pid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:46:22 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv2 4/5] perf tools: Allow to ignore missing pid

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:58:25AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:

SNIP

> >  }
> >  
> > +static bool ignore_missing_thread(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> > +				  struct thread_map *threads,
> > +				  int thread, int err)
> > +{
> > +	if (!evsel->ignore_missing_thread)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	/* The system wide setup does not work with threads. */
> > +	if (!evsel->system_wide)
> > +		return false;
> 
> I'm bit confused with this.  Shouldn't the condition be positive?
> 

ugh, right.. that was last minute change, I had this condition
below together with ignore_missing_thread call and moved it up :-\

thanks for spotting this, attaching v2

jirka


---
Adding perf_evsel::ignore_missing_cpu_thread bool.

When set true, it allows perf to ignore error of missing
pid of perf event syscall.

We remove missing thread id from the thread_map, so the
rest of the processing like ioctl and mmap won't get
disturbed with -1 fd.

The reason for supporting this is to ease up monitoring
group of pids, that 'disappear' before perf opens their
event. This currently leads perf to report error and exit
and makes perf record's -u option unusable under certain
setup.

With this change we will allow this race and ignore such
failure with following warning:

  WARNING: Ignored open failure for pid 8605

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-atmzsjyhrt1j6xjwwmb84upg@git.kernel.org
---
 tools/perf/perf.h       |  1 +
 tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/util/evsel.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.h b/tools/perf/perf.h
index 9a0236a4cf95..1c27d947c2fe 100644
--- a/tools/perf/perf.h
+++ b/tools/perf/perf.h
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct record_opts {
 	bool	     all_user;
 	bool	     tail_synthesize;
 	bool	     overwrite;
+	bool	     ignore_missing_thread;
 	unsigned int freq;
 	unsigned int mmap_pages;
 	unsigned int auxtrace_mmap_pages;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index fd61ebd77c26..04e536ae4d88 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -990,6 +990,8 @@ void perf_evsel__config(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct record_opts *opts,
 	 * it overloads any global configuration.
 	 */
 	apply_config_terms(evsel, opts);
+
+	evsel->ignore_missing_thread = opts->ignore_missing_thread;
 }
 
 static int perf_evsel__alloc_fd(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads)
@@ -1419,6 +1421,33 @@ static int __open_attr__fprintf(FILE *fp, const char *name, const char *val,
 	return fprintf(fp, "  %-32s %s\n", name, val);
 }
 
+static bool ignore_missing_thread(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
+				  struct thread_map *threads,
+				  int thread, int err)
+{
+	if (!evsel->ignore_missing_thread)
+		return false;
+
+	/* The system wide setup does not work with threads. */
+	if (evsel->system_wide)
+		return false;
+
+	/* The -ESRCH is perf event syscall errno for pid's not found. */
+	if (err != -ESRCH)
+		return false;
+
+	/* If there's only one thread, let it fail. */
+	if (threads->nr == 1)
+		return false;
+
+	if (thread_map__remove(threads, thread))
+		return false;
+
+	pr_warning("WARNING: Ignored open failure for pid %d\n",
+		   thread_map__pid(threads, thread));
+	return true;
+}
+
 static int __perf_evsel__open(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct cpu_map *cpus,
 			      struct thread_map *threads)
 {
@@ -1491,6 +1520,21 @@ static int __perf_evsel__open(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct cpu_map *cpus,
 
 			if (fd < 0) {
 				err = -errno;
+
+				if (ignore_missing_thread(evsel, threads, thread, err)) {
+					/*
+					 * We just removed 1 thread, so take a step
+					 * back on thread index and lower the upper
+					 * nthreads limit.
+					 */
+					nthreads--;
+					thread--;
+
+					/* ... and pretend like nothing have happened. */
+					err = 0;
+					continue;
+				}
+
 				pr_debug2("\nsys_perf_event_open failed, error %d\n",
 					  err);
 				goto try_fallback;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
index 6abb89cd27f9..06ef6f29efa1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ struct perf_evsel {
 	bool			tracking;
 	bool			per_pkg;
 	bool			precise_max;
+	bool			ignore_missing_thread;
 	/* parse modifier helper */
 	int			exclude_GH;
 	int			nr_members;
-- 
2.7.4