[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d5fa409-bb4f-f62b-2548-0a3b82228e08@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:46:44 +0200
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
CC: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-drm <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] ARM: dts: da850-lcdk: add the vga-bridge node
Hi,
On 12/12/16 15:05, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> +&lcdc {
> + status = "okay";
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_pins>;
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + lcdc_out: port@1 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + reg = <1>;
> +
> + lcdc_out_vga: endpoint {
> + reg = <0>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vga_bridge_in>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
>
This is not correct. LCDC has just one output, so port@1 doesn't make
sense. It's port@0. But with just one port, you can leave "ports" away.
And you don't need the port's label for anything, if I'm not mistaken. So:
&lcdc {
status = "okay";
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_pins>;
port {
lcdc_out_vga: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&vga_bridge_in>;
};
};
};
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists