[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ef97a97-d72b-a86b-1ddd-0c4c5ace8027@sandisk.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:04:01 +0100
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <paolo.valente@...aro.org>, <osandov@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mq-deadline: add blk-mq adaptation of the deadline IO
scheduler
On 12/08/2016 09:13 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> +static int dd_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
> +{
> + struct deadline_data *dd;
> + struct elevator_queue *eq;
> +
> + eq = elevator_alloc(q, e);
> + if (!eq)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + dd = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*dd), GFP_KERNEL, q->node);
> + if (!dd) {
> + kobject_put(&eq->kobj);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + eq->elevator_data = dd;
> +
> + dd->tags = blk_mq_sched_alloc_requests(256, q->node);
> + if (!dd->tags) {
> + kfree(dd);
> + kobject_put(&eq->kobj);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
Hello Jens,
Please add a comment that explains where the number 256 comes from.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists