[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26757.1481635886@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 13:31:26 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: "Michael Kerrisk \(man-pages\)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Michael Kerrisk <mtk@...7.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@...il.com>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Revised keyrings(7) man page for review
Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
> I use/Linux man-pages uses the "Oxford comma" convention.
"... an optional comma ..." ;-)
There's also:
... LSM security checks are still performed, and may filter out
further keys that the process is not authorized to view.
but has two parts and isn't a list... ;-P
> >> D The key is dead (i.e., has been deleted). (A
> >> key may be briefly in this state during
> >> garbage collection.)
> >
> > No - "dead" in this context means that the key type was unregistered.
>
> Okay, so the text should read as:
>
> D The key is dead (i.e., the key has been unregisā
> tered). (A key may be briefly in this state
> during garbage collection.)
>
> Right?
Not quite. The driver for the key type has been unregistered, not the key.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists