[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d013a3c6-39d8-725a-6752-6a02b5284242@sandisk.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:29:18 +0100
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <paolo.valente@...aro.org>, <osandov@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] blk-mq-sched: add framework for MQ capable IO
schedulers
On 12/08/2016 09:13 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> +static inline void blk_mq_sched_put_request(struct request *rq)
> +{
> + struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
> + struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
> +
> + if (e && e->type->mq_ops.put_request)
> + e->type->mq_ops.put_request(rq);
> + else
> + blk_mq_free_request(rq);
> +}
blk_mq_free_request() always triggers a call of blk_queue_exit().
dd_put_request() only triggers a call of blk_queue_exit() if it is not a
shadow request. Is that on purpose?
> +static inline struct request *
> +blk_mq_sched_get_request(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int op,
> + struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
> +{
> + struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> + struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx;
> + struct request *rq;
> +
> + blk_queue_enter_live(q);
> + ctx = blk_mq_get_ctx(q);
> + hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(q, ctx->cpu);
> +
> + blk_mq_set_alloc_data(data, q, 0, ctx, hctx);
> +
> + if (e && e->type->mq_ops.get_request)
> + rq = e->type->mq_ops.get_request(q, op, data);
> + else
> + rq = __blk_mq_alloc_request(data, op);
> +
> + if (rq)
> + data->hctx->queued++;
> +
> + return rq;
> +
> +}
Some but not all callers of blk_mq_sched_get_request() call
blk_queue_exit() if this function returns NULL. Please consider to move
the blk_queue_exit() call from the blk_mq_alloc_request() error path
into this function. I think that will make it a lot easier to verify
whether or not the blk_queue_enter() / blk_queue_exit() calls are
balanced properly.
Additionally, since blk_queue_enter() / blk_queue_exit() calls by
blk_mq_sched_get_request() and blk_mq_sched_put_request() must be
balanced and since the latter function only calls blk_queue_exit() for
non-shadow requests, shouldn't blk_mq_sched_get_request() call
blk_queue_enter_live() only if __blk_mq_alloc_request() is called?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists