linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2] x86/tsc: Force TSC_ADJUST register to value >= zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:49:10 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Bruce Schlobohm <bruce.schlobohm@...el.com>,
        Roland Scheidegger <rscheidegger_lists@...peed.ch>,
        Kevin Stanton <kevin.b.stanton@...el.com>,
        Allen Hung <allen_hung@...l.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86/tsc: Force TSC_ADJUST register to value >=
 zero

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:14:17PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > @@ -429,8 +447,13 @@ void check_tsc_sync_target(void)
> >  	 * that the warp is not longer detectable when the observed warp
> >  	 * value is used. In the worst case the adjustment needs to go
> >  	 * through a 3rd run for fine tuning.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * But we must make sure that the value doesn't become negative
> > +	 * otherwise TSC deadline timer will create an interrupt storm.
> >  	 */
> >  	cur->adjusted += cur_max_warp;
> > +	if (cur->adjusted < 0)
> > +		cur->adjusted = 0;
> >  
> 
> So depending on how horrid we want to make this we could work around
> this by increasing the ADJUST of the other CPUs by the amount we're
> negative.

That means to increase all CPUs in the package of the other CPU by that
amount ....

> But yes, yuck.

Indeed.

	tglx