linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests: ftrace: Shift down default message verbosity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c0810050-8f95-a9e5-1794-8ad546aabe7b@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:03:19 -0700
From:   Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...il.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: ftrace: Shift down default message verbosity

On 12/13/2016 08:25 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:06:18 -0700
> Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/12/2016 08:23 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> Ping?
>>>
>>> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:58:48 +0900
>>> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> Shift down default message verbosity, so that do not show
>>>> error results in stdout by default. Since that behavior
>>>> is same as giving --quiet option, this patch removes
>>>> --quiet and make --verbose increasing verbosity.
>>>>
>>>> In other words, this changes verbosity options as below.
>>>> ftracetest -q -> ftracetest
>>>> ftracetest    -> ftracetest -v
>>>> ftracetest -v -> ftracetest -v -v (or -vv)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>  
>>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> Are you taking this through yours? Or Should I include in my
>> pull request? Please give me Ack if you want me to.
>>
> 
> I'll take it. I believe it may be built on top of other patches I took.
> I'm getting ready for a push anyway. Since this only touches the self
> test code, I don't need to run my full test suite on it.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 

Yes. I tried applying to my tree and I think it is dependent on other
patches in your tree. Here is my:

Acked-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>

thanks,
-- Shuah