lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v65=Sh-WMEVk0Db48sgUcV6d7-wF_Yh0yJAHANMkGUzFwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:31:38 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Jorik Jonker <jorik@...pendief.biz>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: dts: sun8i: add a cpu0 label to cpu@0 node on A23/33

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>
>
> On 13/12/16 15:22, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> A "cpu0" label is needed on cpu@0 for cpufreq-dt to work.
>>
>
> IIUC any label should be fine and I don't see anything in the driver
> looking for such label name. All I see is it looks for cpu0 regulator
> for *legacy* DTs
>
>> Add such a label, in order to prepare for cpufreq support of A23/33.
>>
>
> You need this as you add the same label in the following patches. The
> commit message sounds like cpufreq-dt search for that label by name.

I think a more proper explanation would be:

The cpu's supply regulator is specified at the board level, hence we
need to add a label to it to reference it without replicating the whole
tree structure.

ChenYu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ