[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161213171519.295490977@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:15:53 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 07/16] locking/rtmutex: Use READ_ONCE() in rt_mutex_owner()
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
commit 1be5d4fa0af34fb7bafa205aeb59f5c7cc7a089d upstream.
While debugging the rtmutex unlock vs. dequeue race Will suggested to use
READ_ONCE() in rt_mutex_owner() as it might race against the
cmpxchg_release() in unlock_rt_mutex_safe().
Will: "It's a minor thing which will most likely not matter in practice"
Careful search did not unearth an actual problem in todays code, but it's
better to be safe than surprised.
Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161130210030.431379999@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -75,8 +75,9 @@ task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p
static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
- return (struct task_struct *)
- ((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_OWNER_MASKALL);
+ unsigned long owner = (unsigned long) READ_ONCE(lock->owner);
+
+ return (struct task_struct *) (owner & ~RT_MUTEX_OWNER_MASKALL);
}
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists