[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJL-oh9FwXSH=R2Vr1J2TDD1LqHfFY2es88rsq4Jz7DjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:09:23 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: mfd: Remove TPS65217 interrupts
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@...il.com> wrote:
> On 12/13/2016 02:25 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:28:31PM +0900, Milo Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> Interrupt numbers are from the datasheet, so no need to keep them in
>>> the ABI. Use the number in the DT file.
>>
>> I don't see the purpose of ripping this out. The headers have always
>> been for convienence, not whether the values come from the datasheet or
>> not.
>
>
> My understanding is it's a same rule as other interrupt controllers.
Oh yes, that's true. We never use defines for interrupts. In that case:
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists