lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:09:23 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@...il.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: mfd: Remove TPS65217 interrupts

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@...il.com> wrote:
> On 12/13/2016 02:25 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:28:31PM +0900, Milo Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> Interrupt numbers are from the datasheet, so no need to keep them in
>>> the ABI. Use the number in the DT file.
>>
>> I don't see the purpose of ripping this out. The headers have always
>> been for convienence, not whether the values come from the datasheet or
>> not.
>
>
> My understanding is it's a same rule as other interrupt controllers.

Oh yes, that's true. We never use defines for interrupts. In that case:

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ