[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1481666853.29291.33.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:07:33 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Anatoly Stepanov <astepanov@...udlinux.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 11:14 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Are there any more comments or objections to this patch? Is this a good
> start or kv[mz]alloc has to provide a way to cover GFP_NOFS users as
> well in the initial version.
Did Andrew Morton ever comment on this?
I believe he was the primary objector in the past.
Last I recollect was over a year ago:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/7/1050
Powered by blists - more mailing lists