[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2cadd9f16c77da7ee7957bfc5e1c67928c23ca48.1481685203.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:25:36 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/boot/64: push correct start_cpu() return address
start_cpu() pushes a text address on the stack so that stack traces from
idle tasks will show start_cpu() at the end. But it currently shows the
wrong function offset. It's more correct to show the address
immediately after the 'lretq' instruction.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
index 1facaf4..b467b14 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
@@ -298,12 +298,13 @@ ENTRY(start_cpu)
* REX.W + FF /5 JMP m16:64 Jump far, absolute indirect,
* address given in m16:64.
*/
- pushq $1f # put return address on stack for unwinder
-1: xorq %rbp, %rbp # clear frame pointer
+ pushq $.Lafter_lret # put return address on stack for unwinder
+ xorq %rbp, %rbp # clear frame pointer
movq initial_code(%rip), %rax
pushq $__KERNEL_CS # set correct cs
pushq %rax # target address in negative space
lretq
+.Lafter_lret:
ENDPROC(start_cpu)
#include "verify_cpu.S"
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists