[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161214000732.1710-1-alexis.berlemont@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 01:07:30 +0100
From: Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@...il.com>,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string
Hi Masami,
Many thanks for your mail.
Here is another patch set which tries to fix the points you mentioned:
* Skip the arguments containing a constant ($123);
* Review the code in charge of the register renaming (search for '%'
and parse it);
* Minor changes (print the argument in case of error, skipping, check
the sdt arg type index);
Many thanks,
Alexis.
Alexis Berlemont (2):
perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments
perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string
tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 6 ++
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 6 ++
tools/perf/util/probe-file.c | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 25 +++++-
tools/perf/util/symbol.h | 1 +
6 files changed, 285 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.10.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists