linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the jc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161214144236.5053299e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:42:36 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Hans Holmberg <hans@...elmunchies.com>,
        Andreas Platschek <andreas.platschek@...ntech.at>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the jc_docs
 tree

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  lib/Kconfig.debug

between commit:

  63d0977c0e85 ("lib/Kconfig.debug: correct documentation paths")

from the jc_docs tree and commit:

  2c81218d9f29 ("Kconfig: lib/Kconfig.debug: fix references to Documenation")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the version from the jc_docs tree) and can
carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell