[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB=NE6XSPhQsjXNPhfuUjjHruBvxt-EF5q4N_Lu2ndz5Uo7_qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:17:25 -0600
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next x86 build fixes
Curious if the x86 symbol build issues are supposed to be resolved
already on linux-next as of today, if not, how's it looking to get
this fixed ? I am carrying around Adam's temporary patch "kbuild:
provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for x86" on top of linux-next but
each day I move on I keep seeing this is still not fixed and keep
having to carry it. Curious what the delays are to get this resolved,
the last thread I saw seemed to acknowledge the issue and that Nick
was working on a fix ?
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists