[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161214180730.GR3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 19:07:30 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf/x86/intel: Account interrupts for PEBS errors
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 05:50:36PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> I also fail to reproduce on other than snb_x (model 45) server
reproduces on my ivb-ep as well model 62.
> thoughts?
cute find :-)
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> @@ -1389,9 +1389,13 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
> continue;
>
> /* log dropped samples number */
> - if (error[bit])
> + if (error[bit]) {
> perf_log_lost_samples(event, error[bit]);
>
> + if (perf_event_account_interrupt(event, 1))
Seems a bit daft to expose the .throttle argument, since that would be
the only point of calling this.
> +static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
> + int throttle, struct perf_sample_data *data,
> + struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + int events = atomic_read(&event->event_limit);
> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Non-sampling counters might still use the PMI to fold short
> + * hardware counters, ignore those.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!is_sampling_event(event)))
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = perf_event_account_interrupt(event, throttle);
> +
> if (event->attr.freq) {
> u64 now = perf_clock();
> s64 delta = now - hwc->freq_time_stamp;
Arguably, everything in __perf_event_overflow() except for calling of
->overflow_handler() should be done I think.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists