[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161214191320.GA6866@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:13:20 -0300
From: "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: ignore zombie process for user profile
Em Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 06:26:02PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:48:05PM -0500, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> > > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> > > Zombie process is dead process. It is meaningless to profile it.
> > > It's better to ignore it for user profile.
> > I recently posted different patch for same issue:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148153895827359&w=2
> The change as below make me confuse.
> + /* The system wide setup does not work with threads. */
> + if (!evsel->system_wide)
> + return false;
> It looks the meaning of the comments is inconsistent with the code.
> Your original patch doesn't work well with the issue.
> But if I change the above code as below, the issue is fixed.
> if (evsel->system_wide)
> return false;
yeah, Namhyung noticed that, Jiri sent a fixed patch, I have it already
in my perf/core branch.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists