[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <271c9d23-d35e-252b-d03b-651457112d28@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 10:48:37 +0900
From: Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@...il.com>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ming.lei@...onical.com,
daniel.wagner@...-carit.de, teg@...m.no, mchehab@....samsung.com,
zajec5@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
markivx@...eaurora.org, stephen.boyd@...aro.org,
broonie@...nel.org, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tiwai@...e.de,
johannes@...solutions.net, chunkeey@...glemail.com,
hauke@...ke-m.de, jwboyer@...oraproject.org,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, jslaby@...e.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...capital.net,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, rpurdie@...ys.net, Abhay_Salunke@...l.com,
Julia.Lawall@...6.fr, Gilles.Muller@...6.fr, nicolas.palix@...g.fr,
dhowells@...hat.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] firmware: add SmPL report for custom fallback
mechanism
Hi Jacek,
On 12/13/2016 06:44 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>
> Could you please verify if leds-lp55xx-common.c driver
> really needs a custom firmware loading fallback mechanism?
Thanks for sharing this. The lp55xx-common uses this mechanism to load
and run LED effect manually, so this could be a misuse case.
I think the right solution is providing device attributes.
At this moment, four drivers use lp55xx-common code.
- lp5521, lp5523: OK if we do not support FW loading fallback mechanism
- lp5562, lp8501: need to create additional sysfs alternatively.
However, we should be careful because I'm not sure this modification
will generate the regression (breaking the user-space) or not.
Best regards,
Milo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists