linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161214200751.GA3622@osiris>
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:07:51 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:     Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:25:49AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please do not add any material for v4.11 to your linux-next included
> > branches until after v4.10-rc1 has been released.
> >
> > Changes since 20161213:
> >
> > The vfs-miklos tree gained a conflict against the ubifs tree.
> >
> > The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the jc_docs tree.
> >
> > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4498
> >  4320 files changed, 189429 insertions(+), 94239 deletions(-)
> 
> New s390 build failure today:
> 
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12883922/
> 
> I reproduced it locally using the older korg s390 toolchain.
> 
> Reverting this and the file compiles fine:
> 
> commit d543a106f96d6f15e4507cf349128912d44356d9
> Author: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> Date:   Tue Dec 6 15:52:10 2016 +0100
> 
>     s390: fix initrd corruptions with gcov/kcov instrumented kernels
> 
> Appears old toolchains don't like this commit.
> 
> Paul.

Yes, a fix is ready to be merged soon:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=features&id=75a357341e7c9d3893405ea6f9d722036012dd1f

Thanks,
Heiko