linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/46] mtdpart: Propagate _get/put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:09:35 -0800
From:   Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:     Karl Beldan <karl.beldan@...il.com>
Cc:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Walter <dwalter@...ma-star.at>,
        Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/46] mtdpart: Propagate _get/put_device()

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 07:24:46PM +0000, Karl Beldan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Brian Norris
> <computersforpeace@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:15:31PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:43:56 +0200
> >> Daniel Walter <dwalter@...ma-star.at> wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> >> >
> >> > If the master device has callbacks for _get/put_device()
> >> > and this MTD has slaves a get_mtd_device() call on paritions
> >> > will never issue the registered callbacks.
> >> > Fix this by propagating _get/put_device() down.
> >>
> >> Brian, can we have this one queued for 4.9? I can't take it in my tree
> >> if you want, but it's probably better if it's in the mtd tree.
> >
> > Applied this patch to l2-mtd.git
> >
> 
> I think this should also go into -stable.

Why? Do you have real use cases that are broken by this? I understand
this is a problem, but I'm curious on how this satisfies the stable
rules.

Also, note that this isn't a regression; it's been broken forever and
apparently no one noticed. IMO that raises the bar a bit (but not
impossibly so) for -stable.

Anyway, if we decide to do this, you'll also want to include the git
hash and applicable kernel versions, per Option 2 [1].

Brian

[1] Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt.