[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1481776147-23041-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 05:29:07 +0100
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@...el.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: use udelay for very short delays
Even on fast systems a 2 microsecond delay is most likely more efficient
as a busy-wait loop. The overhead of a hrtimer does not seem warranted -
change this to a udelay(2).
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
---
Problem found by coccinelle:
Patch was compile tested with: x86_64_defconfig (implies CONFIG_DRM_I915)
Patch is against 4.9.0 (localversion-next is next-20161214)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
index 5b72c50..19fe86b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static void bxt_dsi_device_ready(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
val &= ~ULPS_STATE_MASK;
val |= (ULPS_STATE_ENTER | DEVICE_READY);
I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), val);
- usleep_range(2, 3);
+ udelay(2);
/* 3. Exit ULPS */
val = I915_READ(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port));
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists