linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests: ftrace: Shift down default message verbosity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:02:26 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     shuah@...nel.org
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: ftrace: Shift down default message verbosity

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:03:19 -0700
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org> wrote:

> On 12/13/2016 08:25 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:06:18 -0700
> > Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 12/12/2016 08:23 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >>> Ping?
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:58:48 +0900
> >>> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>> Shift down default message verbosity, so that do not show
> >>>> error results in stdout by default. Since that behavior
> >>>> is same as giving --quiet option, this patch removes
> >>>> --quiet and make --verbose increasing verbosity.
> >>>>
> >>>> In other words, this changes verbosity options as below.
> >>>> ftracetest -q -> ftracetest
> >>>> ftracetest    -> ftracetest -v
> >>>> ftracetest -v -> ftracetest -v -v (or -vv)
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>  
> >>
> >> Hi Steve,
> >>
> >> Are you taking this through yours? Or Should I include in my
> >> pull request? Please give me Ack if you want me to.
> >>
> > 
> > I'll take it. I believe it may be built on top of other patches I took.
> > I'm getting ready for a push anyway. Since this only touches the self
> > test code, I don't need to run my full test suite on it.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > -- Steve
> > 
> > 
> 
> Yes. I tried applying to my tree and I think it is dependent on other
> patches in your tree. Here is my:
> 
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>

Thank you Shuah and Steve! :)


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>