[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1481760463-3515-5-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:07:43 -0800
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>, arve@...roid.com
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, romlem@...gle.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>, pratikp@...eaurora.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@....com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/4] staging: android: ion: Call dma_map_sg for syncing and mapping
Technically, calling dma_buf_map_attachment should return a buffer
properly dma_mapped. Add calls to dma_map_sg to begin_cpu_access to
ensure this happens. As a side effect, this lets Ion buffers take
advantage of the dma_buf sync ioctls.
Not-signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
---
drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
index 86dba07..5177d79 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c
@@ -776,6 +776,11 @@ static struct sg_table *dup_sg_table(struct sg_table *table)
return new_table;
}
+static void free_duped_table(struct sg_table *table)
+{
+ sg_free_table(table);
+ kfree(table);
+}
static struct sg_table *ion_map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
enum dma_data_direction direction)
@@ -784,15 +789,29 @@ static struct sg_table *ion_map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
struct ion_buffer *buffer = dmabuf->priv;
struct sg_table *table;
- return dup_sg_table(buffer->sg_table);
+ /*
+ * TODO: Need to sync wrt CPU or device completely owning?
+ */
+
+ table = dup_sg_table(buffer->sg_table);
+
+ if (!dma_map_sg(attachment->dev, table->sgl, table->nents,
+ direction)){
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+err:
+ free_duped_table(table);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
static void ion_unmap_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
struct sg_table *table,
enum dma_data_direction direction)
{
- sg_free_table(table);
- kfree(table);
+ dma_unmap_sg(attachment->dev, table->sgl, table->nents, direction);
+ free_duped_table(table);
}
struct ion_vma_list {
@@ -889,16 +908,24 @@ static int ion_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
struct ion_buffer *buffer = dmabuf->priv;
void *vaddr;
- if (!buffer->heap->ops->map_kernel) {
- pr_err("%s: map kernel is not implemented by this heap.\n",
- __func__);
- return -ENODEV;
+ /*
+ * TODO: Move this elsewhere because we don't always need a vaddr
+ */
+ if (buffer->heap->ops->map_kernel) {
+ mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
+ vaddr = ion_buffer_kmap_get(buffer);
+ mutex_unlock(&buffer->lock);
}
- mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
- vaddr = ion_buffer_kmap_get(buffer);
- mutex_unlock(&buffer->lock);
- return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(vaddr);
+ /*
+ * Close enough right now? Flag to skip sync?
+ */
+ if (!dma_map_sg(buffer->dev->dev.this_device, buffer->sg_table->sgl,
+ buffer->sg_table->nents,
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ return 0;
}
static int ion_dma_buf_end_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
@@ -906,9 +933,15 @@ static int ion_dma_buf_end_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
{
struct ion_buffer *buffer = dmabuf->priv;
- mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
- ion_buffer_kmap_put(buffer);
- mutex_unlock(&buffer->lock);
+ if (buffer->heap->ops->map_kernel) {
+ mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
+ ion_buffer_kmap_put(buffer);
+ mutex_unlock(&buffer->lock);
+ }
+
+ dma_unmap_sg(buffer->dev->dev.this_device, buffer->sg_table->sgl,
+ buffer->sg_table->nents,
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
return 0;
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists