linux-kernel - Re: Moratorium on coding style patches (was Re: [PATCH] include/linux/kernel.h: fixed coding style issues)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yw1xd1gttnjl.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:54:54 +0000
From:   Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, piotrgregor@...ncme.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Moratorium on coding style patches (was Re: [PATCH] include/linux/kernel.h: fixed coding style issues)

Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:

> On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 18:13 +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> writes:
>> > I call for a tree wide moratorium on pure coding style changes.
> []
>> I'd relax this slightly and say don't do style
>> patches unless as a prelude to some real work.
>
> And exclude drivers/staging

I wouldn't mind seeing staging deleted.  What makes those drivers so
special that they deserve to be included in the main tree without
meeting even the most basic of standards normally required?

-- 
Måns Rullgård